Aviator vs JetX: Multipliers, RTP and Payouts Compared
Aviator vs JetX comes down to one number in most Georgian casino lobbies, and it is the only one anyone quotes: RTP. Aviator has no studio-published RTP; the figure the market runs on is a single 97%, and every number in this comparison is computed from it. JetX ships as an operator-configurable 96.2% to 98.9%, so the better bet depends on which JetX build your casino runs. Where a studio publishes nothing, the cell below stays empty.
Aviator vs JetX at a glance
SmartSoft Gaming publishes a full spec sheet for JetX. Spribe publishes no spec page, so the Aviator column below records only what can be checked. Five of the ten Aviator cells are empty.
The JetX column comes from SmartSoft's own game page and its company profile. The max multipliers, bet limits and round lengths quoted for Aviator elsewhere are claims traded between comparison pages, so none of them appears here.
| Spec | Aviator | JetX |
|---|---|---|
| Studio | Spribe | SmartSoft Gaming |
| Studio founded | 2018, offices including Tbilisi, Warsaw and Kyiv | 2015, in Georgia |
| Game launched | 2019 | 2018 |
| RTP | None published by Spribe; the market runs on 97% | 96.2% to 98.9%, set by the operator |
| Bets per round | Not published | Two independent bets |
| Cashout controls | Not published | Manual, plus auto cashout at a set multiplier |
| Max multiplier | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum and maximum bet | Set by the operator | Set by the operator |
| Chat and session stats | Not published | Moderated chat, round history, stats |
| Promo layer | Not published | Coin Flip, Missions, Prize Drop, Leaderboard |
Verdict: JetX is the documented one. Five of ten cells are empty on the Aviator side and none on the JetX side.
The one piece of math both games run on
Strip the aeroplane and the jet away and the two games are the same object. A multiplier climbs from 1.00x, it can stop at any point including the first tick, and the chance of it surviving to any given height falls away in a fixed pattern.
That pattern is simple. The chance a round reaches at least a given multiplier is the RTP divided by that multiplier. At 97%, a 2x round survives 48.50% of the time, 5x survives 19.40%, 10x survives 9.70%, 50x survives 1.94% and 100x survives 0.97%.
Independent statistical work backs the model up. A study of 20,038 crash rounds from an anonymised platform found the fitted tail exponent landed at roughly 1.98 against a theoretical 2.0, within 1% of the curve the formula predicts.
The consequence matters more than the formula. Expected return is the RTP minus one at every cashout target, so the arithmetic needs no simulation to settle: a 1.5x target and a 50x target both give back 97 lari on every 100 staked. A 3% edge sits below the 4% to 6% the house holds on a Georgian slot lobby, where returns run 94% to 96%, and it works the same way.
Verdict: The curve is identical in both games. Only the RTP moves it, and only the operator moves the RTP.
RTP: one fixed number against a configurable range
One RTP is fixed and the other is not. SmartSoft publishes JetX at 96.2% to 98.9%, and it is a range because the operator selects the build it runs. Aviator's 97% is unpublished by the studio but quoted consistently across the market.
Run it in lari. Put 1,000 GEL of turnover through a 96.2% build and expect 962 GEL back. Put the same 1,000 GEL through a 98.9% build and expect 989 GEL.
The 27 GEL spread between the two ends of the JetX range is wider than the gap between Aviator and the middle of it. The choice is which JetX build the operator runs.
The RTP is stated in the game's own info panel, and the same title can run different settings at different sites, so the build is worth reading off the panel before you compare two operators on it.
Bet limits work the same way. Neither studio publishes a minimum or maximum stake, because limits are set by the operator, so the minimums quoted in naira or rupees on other comparisons tell you nothing about a lari account. Betsson and Betlive both run accounts in lari, and Megapari takes deposits and pays bonuses directly in lari.
Verdict: On RTP, JetX can beat Aviator or lose to it, and the operator decides which.
Multiplier distribution and what a max win really means
Roughly half of all rounds in either game end below 2x, which falls straight out of the survival formula.
| Target | Chance of reaching it at 97% | Roughly |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50x | 64.67% | 1 in 1.5 |
| 2.00x | 48.50% | 1 in 2.1 |
| 5.00x | 19.40% | 1 in 5.2 |
| 10.00x | 9.70% | 1 in 10.3 |
| 50.00x | 1.94% | 1 in 51.5 |
| 100x | 0.97% | 1 in 103 |
| 1,000x | 0.097% | 1 in 1,031 |
| 25,000x | 0.0039% | 1 in 25,773 |
Neither studio publishes a maximum win, and the 10,000x and 25,000x figures traded between comparison pages carry no source.
Take the larger one at face value and it still decides nothing. A 25,000x round arrives once in 25,773, which at the pace below works out to about 143 hours of continuous play for a single expected occurrence. The same table applies to both titles, because Aviator and JetX run the same survival formula, and only the RTP inside it changes.
Verdict: Nobody wins on max multiplier. The published maxima do not exist, and the odds are already 1 in 103 at 100x.
Two bet slots each, whatever you have read
SmartSoft's spec sheet states two independent bets per round for JetX. Several widely read comparisons credit it with three slots and a triple multi-bet feature. JetX3 does not appear in SmartSoft's catalogue, and the three-slot claim describes a different title in the range.
Aviator's dual bet panel is reported everywhere and published nowhere by Spribe, so treat the second slot as unconfirmed until you see it in the lobby.
The standard split puts one bet on a low auto cashout, around 1.5x to 2x, to recover the stake, and leaves the second running for the tail. Neither leg changes expected return. The low leg cuts session variance and the high leg pays for the low one, which is the entire argument for tuning auto cashout settings before you raise your stake.
Turnover is the catch. A two-slot round puts double the stake through the game, which halves the time it takes to clear the wagering on a casino welcome offer and doubles what the house edge costs you per round.
Verdict: Two slots each. The difference is what you do with the second one, not how many you get.
Round pace and what an hour actually costs
Round pace decides the hourly cost, and it moves further than the RTP gap does. Neither studio publishes a round length, and the round-length figures quoted for both games elsewhere carry no source, so this comparison uses one assumption throughout: roughly one round every 20 seconds, about 180 rounds an hour.
The arithmetic is the point. At 180 rounds an hour a flat 1 GEL stake pushes 180 GEL of turnover through the game every hour and costs 5.40 GEL in expectation at a 3% edge. Move to 5 GEL a round and that becomes 900 GEL of turnover and 27 GEL an hour.
Doubling your stake doubles the hourly cost. Changing your cashout target leaves it exactly where it was. Stake and pace decide what a session costs, and the RTP percentage is close to a rounding error next to them.
Turnover at that rate is also why withdrawal speed is worth settling before you start. 1win, Betlive, Crystalbet, Adjarabet and Megapari all clear cashouts inside 24 hours, which is the band that separates the quickest paying sites from the rest.
Verdict: Pace is the one variable neither studio publishes and the one that decides the bill. Set your stake for the pace.
Which one suits your bankroll
If the bankroll is small
Take whichever title your site runs at the higher RTP setting, which in practice means reading the JetX build off the panel first. Cash out low and use the second slot to recover stake. A 2x target lands 48.50% of the time.
If you are playing for the top end
Pick on feel, because the math is identical. No published maximum separates the two and the tail exponent is the same, so the interface is the only real variable left.
If you want the fuller game around the multiplier
JetX, on documented features. SmartSoft publishes a moderated chat, round history and session stats, plus a promotional layer of Coin Flip, Missions, Prize Drop and a Leaderboard, and ships the game in more than 100 currencies. Spribe publishes no equivalent list, so the Aviator side of that comparison cannot be checked.
The short answer
JetX on a 98.9% build beats Aviator. JetX on a 96.2% build loses to it. Read the info panel, then decide.
1win lists Aviator by name and Betlive lists JetX, while Crystalbet runs a dedicated crash section across more than 4,220 games and Stake builds its own provably fair originals, the pattern across the crypto-funded sites. Neither title is stocked everywhere, and the ten games in the wider crash category split the same way: some studios publish a spec sheet and some publish nothing.
Key takeaways
- Both games run the same math: the chance of reaching a multiplier is the RTP divided by that multiplier.
- Spribe publishes no RTP for Aviator, so the 97% every calculation here uses is the market's figure. JetX ships at 96.2% to 98.9% and the operator picks the build.
- The 27 GEL spread across the JetX range is wider than the gap between Aviator and its midpoint.
- Around half of all rounds end below 2x, and 100x arrives about once in 103.
- Neither studio publishes a max multiplier, so the 10,000x and 25,000x figures carry no source.
- Two bet slots each. The three-slot JetX claim describes a different title.
- At an assumed 180 rounds an hour, stake and pace decide what an hour costs. The RTP percentage barely changes it.
Frequently asked questions
Which has the higher RTP, Aviator or JetX?
It depends on the build. Spribe publishes no RTP for Aviator and the market runs on a single 97%, while SmartSoft ships JetX at anywhere from 96.2% to 98.9% and lets the operator choose the setting. A JetX build at the top of that range beats Aviator, and one at the bottom loses to it. Read the game's info panel at your site before assuming either way.
Does a higher RTP mean I win more often?
No. RTP sets the long-run return. The hit rate is a separate quantity, because the chance of reaching any multiplier is the RTP divided by that multiplier, moving from 96.2% to 98.9% shifts the odds of a 2x round from 48.10% to 49.45%. That is 1.35 percentage points on a 2x target.
How often does a crash round actually reach 2x?
Just under half the time. At 97% the chance of reaching 2x is 48.50%, so roughly one round in two ends below it. The same formula gives 9.70% at 10x and 0.97% at 100x, or about once in 103 rounds. Both games follow the identical curve.
Can you place two bets in one round in both games?
SmartSoft publishes two independent bets per round for JetX. Aviator's dual bet panel is reported widely but is not published by Spribe, so confirm it in the lobby. Claims that JetX offers three slots describe a different title in SmartSoft's range.
Is JetX a Georgian game?
Yes. SmartSoft Gaming was founded in Georgia in 2015, and JetX was its first crash title, launched in 2018. Aviator comes from Spribe, founded in 2018, whose founder is based in Tbilisi and which runs offices there alongside Warsaw and Kyiv. JetX is the older of the two games by a year.
What is the minimum bet in lari for Aviator and JetX?
Neither studio publishes one, because minimum and maximum stakes are set by the operator. The figure that applies to you is the one on the bet panel in the lobby you are playing in. Betsson and Betlive both run accounts in lari, and Megapari handles deposits and bonuses directly in lari.
Which casinos available in Georgia carry both Aviator and JetX?
1win lists Aviator by name and Betlive lists JetX, while several sites run broad crash sections that our data records only as a category. Crystalbet has a dedicated crash games area across more than 4,220 games, and Adjarabet and Megapari both carry crash. Confirm the specific title in the lobby, since catalogues change.
Do crash games count toward bonus wagering in lari?
Contribution rates vary by site and are set in each offer's terms, so read them before you deposit. The arithmetic is what matters: a 100 GEL bonus at 30x wagering needs 3,000 GEL of turnover, which at an assumed 180 rounds an hour and a 1 GEL stake is close to 17 hours of play. Larger stakes clear it faster and cost more per hour.
Which game has the higher maximum multiplier?
Neither studio publishes a maximum, so there is no verified answer. The 10,000x figure for Aviator and the 25,000x figure for JetX circulate between comparison pages without a source. Even at face value the difference is academic, since a 25,000x round arrives once in 25,773.
Does auto cashout change your expected return?
No. Expected return is the RTP minus one at every cashout target, which is arithmetic, and no simulation is needed to settle it. A 1.5x target and a 50x target hand back the same 97 lari per 100 staked over a long enough run. Auto cashout changes your variance and removes reaction time, not your edge.
Do Aviator or JetX predictor apps work?
No. Both games generate each round independently, so past results carry no information about the next one. Any tool claiming to forecast a crash point is selling a pattern that does not exist. The only figures worth acting on are the RTP in the info panel and the survival curve.